Which statement about the Temple of Artemis columns is correct?

Which statement about the Temple of Artemis columns is correct?

• A. Each column was 56 feet high
• B. Each column was 40 feet high
• C. Each column was 80 feet high
• D. Each column was 30 feet high

Answer: (A)

Understanding the height of the temple’s columns helps you grasp how monumental its peristyle was. The columns were very tall and slender, typical of Ionic temple architecture, and they stood roughly 56 feet high (about 17 meters). This height fits the grand scale described for the Artemision, with many columns arranged around the perimeter to create a towering, airy effect. Other heights like 30, 40, or 80 feet don’t match the well-attested measurements of the temple’s columns and would distort the proportions expected for this famous Ionic temple. So the statement that each column stood about 56 feet tall best reflects the historical description and architectural character of the temple.

Understanding the height of the temple’s columns helps you grasp how monumental its peristyle was. The columns were very tall and slender, typical of Ionic temple architecture, and they stood roughly 56 feet high (about 17 meters). This height fits the grand scale described for the Artemision, with many columns arranged around the perimeter to create a towering, airy effect. Other heights like 30, 40, or 80 feet don’t match the well-attested measurements of the temple’s columns and would distort the proportions expected for this famous Ionic temple. So the statement that each column stood about 56 feet tall best reflects the historical description and architectural character of the temple.